Loading...

This is default featured post 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Thursday, November 8, 2012

First Buddhists elected to Congress

Wisdom Quarterly; Marco Garcia (AP); The Washington Post; RNS; Deseret News
US Senate, Washington, DC (peacecorpsconnect.org)
Colleen Hanabusa, right, congratulates Tulsi Gabbard after both women won their Hawaii Congressional district seats, Japanese Cultural Center, Honolulu (AP/Marco Garcia).
 
Senator Colleen Hanabusa (THR)
There were a lot of firsts in faith during the 2012 election season according to The Washington Post and some firsts in Congress. Among them are the election of a Buddhist to the Senate and a Hindu to the House, which will help make those chambers more accurately reflect the increasingly diverse religious landscape of the United States.
 
Tulsi Gabbard (chakranews.com)
Democrat Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii was elected, succeeding Representative Mazie K. Hirono, who ran for the US Senate. An Iraq War veteran, Gabbard was born in American Samoa to a Hindu mother and a Catholic father and had served on the Honolulu City Council and in the state Legislature. Whereas California used to lead the way with firsts, now [the MIC is using] Hawaii has taken that distinction farther west.

I don't know how we lost in an Ayn Rand world.
Hirono, who is Japanese and Buddhist, was also elected on Tuesday. In 2006, she and Georgia Democrat Hank Johnson, who is African-American, were the first Buddhists elected to Congress.
  
In 2010, Buddhist Colleen Hanabusa, a Democrat from Hawaii, was elected. She will become the first Buddhist senator when the new Congress convenes in January, Religion News Service reported yesterday.
On the Darker Side
On the tragic side, Monsanto Corporation won its preposterous bid (Proposition 37) to continue keeping secret when its genetically-manipulated human-experiment grains and organisms are sold as food to the general population of California (and the rest of the world. Food insecure Russians no longer accept their corn, prompting the European Union to take another look at their policy).
  
Christian fundamentalist candidate Bachmann
And an anti-sex trafficking bill (Proposition 35) on steroids passed, perverting one of the most important causes of all to further the police state. And former Republican presidential candidate hopeful Michelle "Crazy Eyes" Bachmann and Romney running mate Paul Ryan (shown above) were re-elected, even as they failed in their other bids.

Monday, November 5, 2012

"Stripper Poll" predicts election results

Wisdom Quarterly; US.myspace.com/Power106; FitsNews.com

Strippers who work poles are the best source of predictive poll results (fitsnews.com)

   
Capitalism (Chad Chowe/online.WSJ.com)
Exit polls, entrance poles, polls of likely voters, polls of voters with cell phones but no land line... Who better to ask whom to vote for than pole dancers?
  
Pick a candidate, any candidate. You get a choice between the two sides of the same one. There is no third option, unless you're trying to make a statement. And WQ is.
  
So next time we get our turn again, right?
Who do strippers want if they are let out of the club to vote (which is their legal right with two hours of pay)? They are overwhelmingly for B.S. Obama. But throughout the Bible Belt, strippers working among older white businessmen say they are for Bishop Romney.

MIC told me in advance, but I didn't believe it.
How the the ballot measures breakdown? "What's that?" strippers ask. Would you like to know what's in food you buy? Yes. Then vote yes on 37 in California. Or, you know, read that newspaper thingy they said. It explains things in needlessly misleading language.

"Why would it be misleading?" Because democracy is the worst form of government... except for all the others. We should really give it a try someday. There's no time for this (s)election, but maybe next time.
RESULTS
What do the strippers predict? Obama may not win, but he will be the president (of the corporation) for another four years. Even if the Electoral College or Supreme Court has to hand him the crown Bush-style, he will be king. Strippers have spoken. Bishop Rmoney never really had a chance, even with rampant voter suppression. (This is carried out in various ways but it is most egregious with racial minorities being given "provisional" ballots that count for next to nothing). This is why no authentic Republican was allowed to run. Monsanto, Inc. is likely to prevail in its deception on labeling its genetically modified foodstuffs as per MIC agreement. Libertarian Gary Johnson will ride marijuana to the top in Colorado. California will see through sex trafficking ballot measure that tried to overreach for the police state.
6:00 pm DemocracyNow! national election special
9:00 pm KPFA/KPFK statewide election special
10:00 pm (Spanish election) Informe en español
11:00 pm KPFA/KPFK special: News Team

Why I HATE politics (cartoons)

Pat Macpherson, Pfc. Sandoval, Ashley Wells, Wisdom Quarterly (Posted June 7, 2012)
Hannity and Colmes, rabid right-winger vs. lefty Droopy the duped Democrat
 
I hate politics. Why? I hate them because I'm supposed to. I'm trained to. The powers that be wish it. What's an engaged Buddhist to do? What better way to keep things just the way they are?

No one makes them any more lovable with "corruption," a fancy way of saying corporate money and bribes. The Koch Brothers and the Republicans bought Wisconsin governor Scott Walker's allegiance then kept him in office in spite of what people wanted. He took collective bargaining from public employees because someone told him to. Yawn. Who cares?


(LINK) Koch Brother from another mother Walker survives recall in WI.
  
Destroying the unions means building up the 1%. Vee vill do vut vee are toldt, and vee vill like it! That's the worst thing, corruption. But the second worst thing is how disappointing and ineffectual Democrats are. Such weakness and powerlessness-when-in-power can't be real. B.S. Obama can't be that bad of a negotiator.
  
Any party in power is bad, but what "opposition" are we ever given? Does NPR raise a voice to do more than lean left on social matters while taking a hard swing to the right on all things fiscal? The whole country is socially liberal (whether they admit it or not) and fiscally conservative (as we get economically squeezed to the breaking point).

Let's make the bad times holidays so we can have guilt-ridden good times.

FOX News is the right wing, the Red Ties. MSNBC is the "left" wing, the Blue Ties. (Bloods vs. Crips). Because both parties want the same things, they never really work against each other's interests. Whoever wins, the most important thing is that the two-party system stay in place.
   
The mainstream media kills any third party dreams, any enthusiasm, any attempt to vote. We don't regard voting as a thing we need to do. We consider it a burden. So only activist old women of a particular race get excited about what "needs to be done." 

Rachel Maddow, corporate "commie pinko" voice in a short haircut

How did white Afrikaners keep black South Africans enslaved for so long? The same way the minority party (Republicans) keeps the masses (Democrats and Independents) confused and barking up the wrong trees. PR decides whom we vote for, not us. We do not decide what we do. On the bright side in California, after a gang of policemen slowly and brutally tortured and murdered a homeless/mentally incapacitated man (Kelly Thomas) in public, two gang members are being prosecuted for the "accident." And three Fullerton City Council members were thrown out of office for how they handled it.

Who will save us from GOP-TV FOX? Simpsons, suggests good Maddow.

Tuesday elections also saw the demise of LA City Attorney (prosecutor) Carmen Trutanich's ambitions. Trutanich, an enemy of the Occupy Movement and LA artists, lost his bid to become District Attorney in a stunning upset. He didn't even win a spot in the run off. Will racial profiling continue as police stop, frisk, and beat? Will Obama continue to act like a member of the Bush Administration? Is anyone enough to care?

If it weren't for Seth MacFarlane's humor, what would the country do?

News in paradise, FOX (Network) News, which is SoCal local news lite

Better than Romney, WORSE than Bush (video)

Ashley Wells and Pat Macpherson, Wisdom Quarterly; (Posted Oct. 26, 2012) (Third-Party Presidential Debate 2012) Moderated by Larry King. Hosted by the Free and Equal Elections Foundation at the Chicago Hilton, it covers the economy, "war" on drugs, civil liberties, medical marijuana, education, foreign and domestic policy.
"Obama wins! Romney never had a chance," the headlines will read. All this "dead heat" nonsense will evaporate like Dole's chances against Mr. Hillary Clinton. B.S. Obama may not survive his unlucky stars, according to psychic-astrologer Sean David Morton, but barring that, Mitt Rmoney never had a chance. It's easy to call him an incompetent "idiot," as Jon Stewart does (below). But we suspect that when he makes his first billion, the Old Boys' Club (global elite) will let him in on the secret of why he never had a chance of "winning."
  
How can you "win" staged elections without The Producers being in on it? Those who decide the outcome do most of their work during the parties' primaries and selection process in the first place. If We The People had had our way, environmentalist and legacy-rancher Al Gore (whose wife Tipper wanted to censor music with PMRC) would have spared us all the horrors of Dicks Cheney and Bush, but who actually runs this world?
 
 

  
How could our beloved leader, our Commander and Chief, the future emperor of the world be any worse than his predecessor George W. Bush? Revolutionary commentator Bob Avakian, an actual socialist/communist, explains in detail.

Innocent child asks Mr. Cool: "Why do people hate you?"

Sexy Jewish support for the Democrat (video)

Sarah Silverman (sarahsilvermanonline.com); (Posted July 18, 2012)



"I'm listening."
Following The Great Schlep during the last election cycle, comedienne Sarah Silverman gets very racy and even stoops to soliciting to steer Jewish money toward the Democratic candidate. She propositions multi-billionaire, Israel-booster, and gambling magnate Sheldon Adelson:
 
  
"If you give that $100 million to Obama instead of Romney, I will -- well, I won't have sex with you because we're not married and I'm a nice girl," Silverman explains seductively in the video before naming a sex act that includes keeping her clothes on. Ana Kasparian and Cenk Uygur discuss Silverman's indecent proposal to Romney-backer Adelson.
 
But Obama is worse than Bush!
Wisdom Quarterly (COMMENTARY)
Green Party 2012 nominee Dr. Jill Stein (Laura-Chase McGehee/AP)
  
Yes, that's true. Barry Soetoro Obama has put through most of the Bush Dynasty's illegal proposals, much to the surprise of his cousin Dick Cheney.
   
Even Karl Rove is surprised. But the fact is he is a lot less offensive than G.W. Bush, so that his current abuses do not seem so bad by comparison.
  
At least Obama is a great orator like former presidents Clinton and Lincoln. So the question is, "Who's worse, Obama or Romney?" We're not sure.
  
"The devil you know is better than the devil you don't," politicos like to remind us. And rigged American politics (video: Princeton Univ.) are all about picking the "lesser of two evils." Could the Whitehouse made the choice any easier? Willard "Mittens" Romney is a deplorable liar, but at least he's not believable.
  
B.S. Obama is a deplorable liar, yet so many of us believe him. Who's the greater danger?
   
Give us the Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein, give us the Comeback Kid Kucinich, give us Ron Paul, we'll even settle for Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson. Better yet, let's undo the farce that we live in a Republic with "democratic" elections and call it by its true names. Blank, blank, and fill-in-the-blank.

Why We Occupy #4 (occucards.com)
We're with Dougie the Dog on this one: We'd rather scissor Sheldon than engage in the futile federal ritual of voting for either Tweedledee or Tweedledum(b) only to be ignored by the military-industrial complex and its actual decision makers. The MIC does not need an official presidency, or the Kenyan they installed, to do what it wants in the name of the US and its partner police states.

Better Presidential Debates (comedy)

Wisdom Quarterly; (NPR, Oct. 6, 2012); (therumble2012.com)   

  
What if nobody won? (Getty/ChipSomodevilla)
While failed-comedian Bill O'Reilly (FOX News) and faux-newser Jon Stewart (Comedy Central) duked it out, there was another much more serious alternative presidential debate presented by NPR (National Public Radio). It was between third-party candidates Jill Stein (Green) and Gary Johnson (Libertarian).
 
The NPR third-party candidate debate
Green Jill Stein (jillstein.org)
What's it like to be a third-party candidate running for president? Ralph Nader can tell us: "You're excluded from the debates," he says. "You spend an exhausting amount of time, until Labor Day, trying to get over the ballot access barriers. Your petitioners are harassed in the streets; you're subjected to baseless lawsuits by one party or another."
  
Nader has run for president three times -- four if you count the time he ran unofficially. In 2000, he managed to win almost 3 percent of the national vote.
Libertarian Gary Johnson
To this day, getting a third-party candidate into a presidential debate is practically impossible.
  
[The one-party system we have, halved in two, has made sure of that.] The Commission on Presidential Debates says that to be included, you have to poll 15 percent with voters. That's why George Farah, founder of Open Debates, a group that wants the system reformed, thinks the commission is the main problem.

"This commission exists for the principle purpose of protecting and strengthening the two parties," Farah says. "Every four years they allow the major party candidates to negotiate agreements that dictate many of the terms of the debates -- including the exclusion of popular third-party voices."
  
So given the two major party candidates had 90 minutes and at least 50 million viewers for their debate last Wednesday, [NPR] decided to invite two of the third-party candidates to a debate of our own.

Gary Johnson is the Libertarian Party's nominee. Jill Stein is the Green Party's nominee. They joined moderator -- and host of weekends on All Things Considered -- Guy Raz for a debate focusing on domestic issues: the economy, health care, and the role of government. More

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Clash of the Titans: Obama vs. NOTA (video)

Pat Macpherson, Ashley Wells, CC Liu, Pfc. Sandoval, Wisdom Quarterly
"Dad, could you vote for NOTA ('None of the Above') this year and leave it at that?"

It is good to have a Muslim. But it would be better to have one who tells the truth rather than reading a litany of pleasant lies from teleprompters (sociologicalimagination.org).

 
As  Americans we are conditioned to yawn or gag at "politics" -- which we instantly associate with boredom, deception, pointlessness... And that is the way the MIC (Military-Industrial Complex) wants it.
   
Stay out of it, public; it's none of your business. We run this show, selecting and "electing" the most cooperative candidates.
  
"Sold to the  highest bidder!" M disapproves.
You tacitly consent because we manufacture your consent. You tacitly consent because you give up your voice, which could sway us (not that we will admit to having been swayed) and stave off or at least delay our more draconian plans.
  
So hold your nose and stomach, and pick the "lesser of two evils."
  
He was an Indonesian Muslim, but so what?
Whomever you choose, the choice is the same: evil, to a lesser or greater degree. The MIC went too far to the right propping the Naziesque Bush Dynasty. So now we get a smooth talking "liberal" who SAYS all the right things, all  the things the MAJORITY of Americans want to hear. He doesn't do them, but he does SAY them. (Thank you, PR Firms and Focus Groups, for the 411). Debates-schmebates!
There is nothing to choose when we have no choice. Our ONE-party system (two wings, moderate-right and extreme-right) offers no real choice at all. But there are other candidates. Wisdom Quarterly is rooting for Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein.
  
However, we would be happy to see just about anyone else elected:
 
Gov. Ventura, Congressman Kucinich, nun Pema Chodron, anchor Amy Goodman, Republicans Dr. Ron Paul or son Senator Rand Paul, Gary Johnson (Libertarian Party), Rocky Anderson (Justice Party), Virgil Goode (Constitution Party), Prof. Noam Chomsky, crank Ralph Nader, even billionaire Oprah Winfrey -- anyone other than the corporate shills engaged in this media-orchestrated horse race to the White House finish line.
  
Who will win, Barry or Mittens or "None of the Above"? What a nailbiter! Psychic Sean David Morton says Hillary Clinton is a surprise shoo in for 2012, but that may be on another timeline! (See Bruce Goldberg to go live in that segment of our multiverse).  Here we present the the REAL debates:

DemocracyNow! expands the debate by including the voices of three presidential candidates shut out of the official debate with parts of the Obama-Romney excuse for a debate that excluded third-party candidates. Here they get a chance to respond.

"Lies." ... "More lies!"
From one dishonest broker to another: Donald Trump threatens to withhold $5 million dollars for charity unless Barry Soetoro (Pres. Barack Hussein Obama) releases his college and passport applications, which Barry cannot do without revealing that he was qualified to be President of the Corporation of the USA but not the country formerly known as the USA. 
  
His birth certificate was fake, a poor forgery, and he has a very questionable social security number, but details-schmeetails. He was installed with a mission to become a the benevolent face of a very violent dictatorship; he has no real power other than to be a mouthpiece. He killed that guy (Akbar Khan) he brags about killing; he did hard drugs with gay partners, getting them killed to ensure their silence... What are some more doctored documents going to do to his legacy? He is a so-so debater and a great orator, and isn't that all that matters? Pornographer Flint offered a million to see Romney's tax forms.

Friday, July 20, 2012

Comics make everything better (cartoon)

Cartoonist David Horsey (latimes.com) and others; P.B. Law (buddhisthumor.org)

(Thetandd.com) With the shooting in Aurora, Colorado, inside a packed movie theater showing “The Dark Knight Rises,” questions are being raised as to whether there is any connection between the killings and the movie’s plot and the character of Batman -- in which a masked villain leads a murderous crew into a packed football stadium and wages an attack involving guns and explosives. More
   


Animation: Buddhist/Christian conversation
There are many types of Buddhists and there are many types of Christians. This is only a conversation between two individuals. (It's comedic).
  
What Makes You Not a Buddhist?
Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche
"Some people think that stringent rules and virtuous deeds are the essence of Buddhism, but these are only a small component of Buddha's skillful and abundant methods. He knew that not everyone is able to understand ultimate truths right from the start. It is difficult for many of us to process concepts such as 'hell is merely the perception of your own aggression,' let alone the concept of emptiness. Buddha doesn't want Jack to be caught in a personal 'hell,' but he can't tell Jack to work with his perceptions and aggression either because Jack is an idiot. So for Jack's sake, Buddha teaches that there is an external hell and that in order to avoid going there and being boiled in molten iron, Jack must stop entertaining his non-virtuous, negative actions and emotions. Such teachings pervade the Buddhist milieu; very often we see hell realms painted on the walls of Buddhist temples, complete with burning bodies and terrifying gorges of frigid water. These images can be taken literally or figuratively, depending on the capacity of the student. Those with superior faculties know that the source of everyday hell, our suffering, stems from our own perceptions. They know that there is no judgment day and there is no judge. Buddha's final aim is to make Jack understand, like these superior students, that there is no hell realm apart from his own aggression and ignorance. By temporarily minimizing his negative actions, Jack is diverted from becoming more entangled with his perceptions, misgivings, and paranoia." More

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The Shifting Sands of Change.

(PHOTO CREDIT: Shifting Sands in the Maowusu Desert in China, by Michael Reynolds/EPA).

I was contemplating today about the release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma and how quickly change can occur. Day after day, month after month and year after year it seemed that Suu Kyi would be frozen in her house arrest for the rest of her life. Then, over-night the seemingly impossible occurred--she was released into the arms of her joyful supporters. It still remains to be seen what effect this will have on the greater politics of Burma, but for now it is a powerful reminder of impermanence.

The leaders of countries put on a great show of power, strength and dominance with their armies, imposing uniforms and intimidating rhetoric, but the truth is that they are just as subject to change as anyone else. I found a great example of this online. It's a presentation (below) that someone put together showing the futility of clinging to power, or anything for that matter. It shows how many times borders changed hands in Europe over the last 10 centuries.

It is compressed into 5 minutes, which shows how the mind is often tricked into thinking that time seems to drag on when one is enduring a lot of suffering. However, that time passes faster than the speed of light when measured against the life-span of the universe. Dictators come and go but the Dharma will concur all.
~Peace to all beings~

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Buddhist Bhutan Bans Monastics from Voting.

In the Buddhist kingdom of Bhutan monks have been allowed to vote in political elections, but that is about to change. The government says it's to maintain a distinct space between religion and politics. Yet, one has to wonder if they've gone too far in that pursuit since Buddhist clergy have been beneficial over the years in effecting political change that helps create a fertile field for less suffering for a vast, diverse number of people.

Two obvious examples being the Dalai Lama and Thich Nhat Hanh who both have advocated for political freedoms of all people but especially in their homelands of Tibet and Vietnam.

In fact, Zen master Hanh has developed a form of socially active Buddhism called, "Engaged Buddhism" which teaches Dharma practitioners on how to apply Dharma lessons to real world challenges such as social, political and economic realities. His aim, however, isn't necessarily to favor one political side over another. In fact, during the Vietnam War his group focused on the innocent community caught in between the armies of the Communist and Democratic sides. Engaged Buddhist inspires us to practice the Dharma in ways that aid us in helping our communities become better stewards of the people and its resources (nature and otherwise) so that the collective suffering can be lessened. Hanh embraced this way of engaging the world as a form of following the natural conclusions of compassion combined with the reality of interconnection. In other words, monks and the layity can't practice compassion as called for by the reality of interdependence without being apart of the community.

Engaged was partly inspired by the Chinese monk Taixu. Taixu was concerned about monastics and laity alike in Pure Land Buddhism being distracted and obsessed with working to escape Earth for the otherworldly and supernatural Pure Land. He felt that the awareness of the suffering of others, which engenders compassion to help transform this current life--in this current moment into a happier reality was being lost out of a personal desire for transcendental bliss. It wasn't the belief in an end to suffering via Amida in the Pure Land itself that he was concerned about. It was with his perceived obsession that many had with it, which he felt was disconnecting people from each other, turning people into selfish beings and ultimately preventing the betterment of the society he lived in. It certainly inhibits one from fulfilling the Bodhisattva Vow taught by many Buddhist traditions.

At it's core, the Bodhisattva Vow is a commitment one makes to take action toward helping others within one's community receive the same respect, happiness and betterment that we might have and wish for our own family. This then is a wonderful code for politicians and other leaders today to guide their service for citizens. It goes to show that Buddhist principles aren't simply for spiritual pursuits but can also be beneficial in the public service arena. Still, I think it's important to find the middle ground between politics and spirituality. However, I feel that this decision to outright prevent monks and nuns in Bhutan from voting to be veering off the Buddha's compass of the middle path of finding a healthy balance between politics and spirituality.

Some believe that politicians are incapable of ruling in a just way as politics is driven by desire. Yet, take the example of Emperor Ashoka who used the Dharma as his guide when ruling his people. He was initially a brutal and greedy leader until he was changed by the Dharma, which led him to change many of his ways; including turning toward a vegetarian diet out of compassion for animals. His later rule was motivated by kindness, egalitarianism and philanthropy.

In Bhutan, the monks and nuns may personally decide to avoid politics altogether to dedicate all of their efforts toward spiritual endeavors. However, to prevent them from voting, (if they are so inclined) means taking away peoples' personal freedom, which isn't just antithetical to good government but also to the Dharma's message to not spread suffering and discord. It makes me wonder what the Dalai Lama would think of Bhutan's actions given his views on politics. As well as the reality that Bhutan predominately follows the Tibetan version of Buddhism. Preventing monks and nuns from voting means taking away from communities the many voices of moderation, peace, compassion and happiness that the monastics represent. If we feel that hearing their opinions helps improve life then we'd be silly to prevent those opinions from being registered in the political process.

At the same time, there does need to be a clear line drawn to prevent religion from getting involved in the actual crafting of policy in government. This also goes for preventing government from sanctioning and propagating one religion over another, which raises another question in Bhutan. The Bhutanese constitution that was drafted in 2008 still heavily favors Buddhism, which seems to contradict the government's policy of keeping religion and government separate.

~Peace to all beings~

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Discouraged.

***WARNING: LONG Rant ahead that's not your typical "Kittens and flowers" Buddhist post***

I'm struggling lately in my Dharma practice. I haven't meditated in months--not because I don't want to because I do, but I just can't get myself to do it. A large part of it is my mental illness that makes finding motivation extra challenging. Especially when the heavy medicating drugs I have to take to prevent mania and psychotic episodes zap me further of the will to do much of anything. It's difficult to fully convey how difficult it is to over-come.

Furthermore, I deal with a constant level of depression just beneath the surface of even my best days where I feel fairly decent. And please don't say, "Everyone gets depressed" because deep, clinical depression isn't like just having a bad day. Irregardless of that it's just an insensitive thing to say to someone who is living with clinical depression. It's chronic and biologically based on chemical imbalances in the brain.

And it's not as easy as just taking a pill because I already do, and still there is this underlying level of feeling like life isn't worth it. People think just because there are medications that they are cures--they help take the corners off the sharpest symptoms but they don't "cure" you in the sense that they don't bring you to the level of those who don't live with a severe mental illness.

Ironically, I was attracted in part to Buddhism because of it's psychological benefits, and I still believe it has immense help for those dealing with mental illness. However, Buddhism is difficult for anyone let alone for people with mental health challenges (unless you're enlightened, and how many can honestly claim that?). And it seems that the more I think I know about Buddhism the less I actually do. Everyone loves that "honeymoon phase" when you first taste the Dharma and it literally changes the way you see the world for the better but then the nitty-gritty, hard work begins and at times you stop and ask yourself, "Is this really worth it?"

It is. Buddhism can be a real bitch, and sometimes I wish I could just adhere to a religion where blind faith was about all I needed to do. However, I have felt those fleeting moments of enlightenment too profoundly to abandon the Dharma. I'm just discouraged about how poor my practice is right now, and has been for some time. An aspect of this discouragement stems from a lot of anger that I struggle with on a daily basis, which is, in part, again, rooted in the schizoaffective disorder.

I have Attention Deficit Disorder (or, A.D.D.) in conjunction with the affective side of things (affective simply means mood disorder, or bipolar. So, schizoaffective disorder is a combination of some schizophrenic symptoms and some bipolar symptoms). A.D.D. is a condition, which (in part) prevents the brain from being able to screen out stimuli that most people can relegate to the background.

So, while I am also hearing and listening to you talking to me, I can also hear at the same time: birds chirping outside, the kids screaming in their yard as they play, the traffic noise, the humming of the refrigerator and other appliances, the lawn mower going in the distance, etc. and I can't screen it out to focus simply on the conversation. All of this noise at once raises the stress in my mind and makes me impatient with the inability to focus on just one sound, which often makes me angry. In addition, I am hyper-aware of what is going on in the world and I get so angry because I just see humanity (and especially here in America) doing everything it can to destroy itself, its environment, its economy, its political system of democracy, its compassion for those who need assistance, its decency toward others in public places, its health care system, its acceptance of minorities and those of different sexual orientation, and on and on.

It makes me wonder what's the point of doing anything?!! Why participate in society and voting when it doesn't seem to make a difference or matter. What is the difference between letting karma do it's thing and predestination because some Buddhists seem to just shrug their shoulders in the face of struggles as if to say, "Eh, it's just karma doing its thing--what's the point?" And, yes, I know that suffering is inevitable and everywhere. I know that the world is not the place to look for stability. However, it seems that in response, many Buddhists take the default position to disconnect from society and disregard politics.

Yet, I struggle with this solution because it seems rather fatalistic, nihilistic and a form of avoidance. It seems to me that we owe it to ourselves to try and do our best to make it a better world--even if it can never be perfect. Aren't we making things worse if we just disconnect from society? Don't we have a duty to try our best to help build a better society? What if everyone just disregarded politics and civic responsibilities? Isn't it a bit selfish in a way? If no one tried to maintain some sort level of a stable world then it seems to me that some dictator would just take advantage of that and wipe out whole sections of the globe. Isn't that basically just letting suffering multiply? It's one thing to realize that suffering on some level is inevitable. However, to just disconnect seems to ironically cause more suffering from less and less good-hearted people participating to crafting how a country's general society behaves.

I'm certainly not giving up on Buddhism by any stretch but I'm discouraged today and it has been building. I guess my discouragement is with a lot of things but my Buddhist practice has me a bit frustrated, dispirited and depressed. I know it's not Buddhism that is the problem, and I know that I have a lot of work to do but please don't just post simplistic comments saying things like, "All you have to do is 'A' or 'B.'" Or, "You're problem is 'X.'"Everyone is full of advise but it's all easier said than done.

I'm not necessarily looking for answers, or advice--just some sympathy and assurance that I'm not the only one with these discouragements. I mean, intuitively I know that I'm not the only one but the things I hear sometimes from my fellow Buddhists makes me feel like I missed out on some meeting where everyone gained enlightenment. I'm not any kind of expert and I've got plenty of rust around the edges but I am always skeptical of people who seem to think they have it all figured out and that they're going to set everyone straight on how to be like them.